critical evaluation

critical evaluation report.- Only Medicine Related Tutors . Others no need to apply and ask for work
Task Description (Instructions):
For this task you need to write a 2300 word critical evaluation report. In your report you will critically evaluate a journal article and discuss its relevance to clinical nursing practice. You must choose to evaluate a Randomised Controlled Trial OR a Qualitative Study (see below).

For this report you must use the ‘critical evaluation tool template’ (available below) to guide what information to include in each section. The template is your guide only and is not to be submitted.

In your report you must use the following headings:
· Introduction (200 words)
· Title and Abstract (100 words)
· Structuring the Study (300 words)
· The sample (150 words)
· Data Collection (300 words)
· Data Analysis (300 words)
· Findings (300 words)
· Conclusion (150 words)
· Relevance to clinical nursing practice (500 words)
· You need to include a reference list (not included in word count).
Must FOLLOW MARKING GUIDELINES
Find the attached Documents below

Assessment 3:Critical Evaluation

2300words

Theaim of this assignment is tocritically evaluate a journal article. This will provide you with the skills and knowledge to be able to evaluate the quality and relevance of research so that you can make informed decisionsabout applying it to practice.

This assignment addresses the followingcourselearningoutcome/s:
1. Examine the contribution of research to evidence-based practice;
2. Evaluate the credibility of the information provided by research studies;
3. Demonstrate understanding of the major elements of the research process that underpin translation to practice.

Task Description (Instructions):
For this task you need to write a 2300 word critical evaluationreport. In your report you will critically evaluate a journal article and discuss its relevance to clinical nursing practice. You must choose to evaluate a Randomised Controlled Trial OR a Qualitative Study (see below).

For this reportyou must use the ‘critical evaluation tool template’(available below) to guide what information to include in each section.The template is your guide only and is not to be submitted.

In your reportyou must use the following headings:
• Introduction (200 words)
• Title and Abstract (100 words)
• Structuring the Study (300 words)
• The sample (150 words)
• Data Collection (300 words)
• Data Analysis (300words)
• Findings (300 words)
• Conclusion (150 words)
• Relevance to clinical nursing practice (500 words)
• You need to include a reference list(not included in word count).

Case Studies– You need to choose ONE of these case studies to evaluate in your report.

CHOICE 1: Randomised Controlled Trial, Case Study
Journal Article:
Bugden, S., Shean, K., Scott, M., Mihala, G., Clark, S., Johnstone, C., … Rickard, C. (2016). Skin glue reduces the failure rate of emergency department-inserted peripheral intravenous catheters: A randomized controlled trial. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 68, 196–201.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.11.026
What the study is about:
Peripheral intravenous catheters are the most commonly used medical invasive device in hospitals today and are frequently initiated in the emergency department. Peripheral intravenous catheter failurefrequently occurs after 48 hours post insertion, suggesting that improvements in securement can be targeted at this timeframe. A novel approach for improved peripheral intravenous catheter fixation is the use of medical-grade skin glue (cyanoacrylate) at the insertion site. Skin glue has been reported to be effective for securing central venous, epidural, and peripheral arterial catheters, with improved fixation compared with standard polyurethane dressings.

CHOICE 2: Qualitative Study, Case Study

Journal article:
Bernoth, M., Dietsch, E., & Davies, C. (2013). Two dead frankfurts and a blob of sauce: The serendipity of receiving nutrition and hydration in Australian residential aged care.Collegian, 21, 171-177.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2013.02.001

What the study is about:
Social relationships have been repeatedly identified as essential to nursing home resident quality of life, life meaning and satisfaction, and psychological wellbeing. Articulating the views of residents, and the work residents engage in to develop relationships with both peers and staff, is necessary to facilitate identification of opportunities for targeted interventions that promote, support, and sustain relationships in practice.

Otherelements:
• Ensure thatyouuse scholarlyliterature1(digitisedreadings,research articles, relevantGovernment reports andtext books) that havebeen publishedwithin the last6 years.
• Use academic language2throughout.
• You need to adhere strictly to the word limit. Refer to the Assignment Presentation Formatting Guidelines for more information about word limits.
1Scholarlyorpeer-reviewedjournalarticlesarewrittenbyscholarsorprofessionalswhoareexpertsintheirfields,asopposedtoliteraturesuchasmagazinearticles, whichreflectthetastesofthegeneralpublicandareoftenmeantasentertainment.
2Everydaylanguageispredominantlysubjective.Itismainlyusedtoexpressopinionsbasedonpersonalpreferenceorbeliefratherthanevidence.WrittenacademicEnglishisformal.Itavoidscolloquialismsandslang,whichmaybesubjecttolocalandsocialvariations.Formallanguageismorepreciseandstable,andthereforemoresuitablefortheexpressionofcomplexideasandthedevelopmentofreasonedargumentation.

Formatting and Submission
Please submit your Report as ONE document that includes (in this order):
2. Assignment Title Page with correct details.
3. Your report, appropriately formatted (font, line spacing, margins, page numbers, student number etc.).
4. Reference list on a separate sheet and appropriately formatted. This is additional to the word limit.

find the cost of your paper