This assignment is worth 25 extra credit points (the video says 5, but let’s make it 25!) 🙂
For this assignment, you will need to watch the Stephen Ceci video, “Truth and Consequence”. Then, answer the following question in a 750-word response:
Imagine you are a jury member in a case with a child eyewitness. Would you put more credence in the eyewitness testimony of a child who had a lot of prior knowledge about the person who was accused of a crime or a child who had never met the person? Why? Use evidence and terminology from the video to support your answer. Then, write one thing that you learned from the video that surprised you.
Write a thoughtful, 750 word (double-spaced, 12 pt. font, 1” margins) response based on what you learned in the video. You must cite specific things from the video to get credit. Upload to canvas as a word doc.
Truth and Consequence Video (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.)