Science Seminar

300 word minimum! The goal of your critique is to reflect on the scientific/technical content of the seminar, identifying what you did and did not understand, and your thoughts on the broader implications of the topic to Bioengineering or Biomedical Science. You can also use this opportunity to address the style of the presentation, what did and did not work for you, and perhaps the purpose of the presentation and stage of career of the presenter (e.g., faculty candidate versus distinguished lecturer) – but you are encouraged to focus your critique to the technical content. Try to distinguish important principles of the science presented, what you learned, and your perspective on the seminar’s topic. Read abstract:

find the cost of your paper