Topic: Organizational Management

Description

This is an analysis paper:

Many of the approaches to management and/or managerial theories are based on historical approaches to management and/or historical managerial theories. Analyze the approach to management an organization takes with which you are familiar.
In the analysis identify how this approach is different from and similar to at least one historical approach. Assess how effective (or ineffective) the approach is.
Your well-written paper must adhere to the following parameters:
Be 5-6 pages in length, not including the title and reference pages.
Be supported by four scholarly references. Remember, you must support your thinking and prior knowledge with references; all facts must be supported; in-text references used throughout the assignment must be included in an APA-formatted reference list.
Review the grading rubric, which can be found in the Module 3 folder.
Be formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA.

Reading related to this paper:
Conkright, T. A. (2015). Using the four functions of management for sustainable employee engagement. Performance Improvement, 54(8), 15-21. doi: 10.1002/pfi.21506  Mintzberg, H. (2013). Simply managing: What managers do and can do better. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. (Read Chapter 1: Managing Beyond the Myths: What Management Is and Isn’t and Chapter 6: Managing Effectively: Getting to the Essence of Managing.)  Powers, E. L. (2014). Innovating our thinking about management: A new model. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 79(1), 40-47.

ORG502 Critical Thinking Rubric – Module 3

Criteria Meets Expectation Approaches Expectation
Below Expectation Limited Evidence
Content, Research, and Analysis 17-20 Points 13-16 Points 9-12 Points 5-8 Points Requirements Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 13-15 Points 10-12 Points 7-9 Points 4-6 Points Content Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources. Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials. 13-15 Points 10-12 Points 7-9 Points 4-6 Points Critical Analysis Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given. Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation. Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation. Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given. 9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points Sources / Examples Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. Sources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course are clearly deficient.

find the cost of your paper